Written by Kim Klein
For obvious reasons, the celebration and glee of Carnival was suspended in Haiti this year. It’s as if the Lenten somberness of tomorrow’s Ash Wednesday started when the earthquake took such an unbelievable toll on Haiti.
Just as religious reflection can lead people to a more commons-centered orientation, we saw people respond to the disaster in Haiti with the same outpouring of sharing and cooperation. The Commons was there in Haitians risking their health and safety to form impromptu rescue teams before relief started pouring in from across the globe. And we’ve seen the idea of a commons come to life as people do whatever they can to support the struggle to overcome scarcity and disaster in Haiti.
But even as the response to the suffering in Haiti inspires faith in the ideal of the commons, there’s been an interesting tension between the market and the commons at play here at home. As with other natural disasters, the same media that contributes to consumerism and privatization creates a sense of crisis through constant coverage of the disaster (whether the earthquake in Haiti, Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, or the tsunami in the Indian Ocean) that shocks the public into a commons-based response. Whether through celebrity-driven telethons or singles on iTunes benefiting relief efforts, the same architecture that normally creates private wealth is temporarily re-directed towards the common good, but this surge in commons-based thinking is fleeting.
Read more at <a data-cke-saved-href=”http://kimkleinandthecommons.blogspot.com/” href=”http://kimkleinandthecommons.blogspot.com/” target=”_blank” “=”” title=”Kim Klein and the Commons”>Kim Klein and the Commons